External Network
Internet-facing systems, payment services, remote access, exposed administration, perimeter controls, and exploitable external attack paths.
Payment Security
TruSec tests external and internal attack paths, applications, and segmentation controls to determine whether systems affecting payment data can be reached or compromised within the authorized scope.
Service Overview
PCI DSS penetration testing is not simply a scan of Internet-facing systems.
The assessment should reflect the cardholder data environment, connected systems, segmentation controls, access pathways, applications, and the ways an attacker could move from lower-trust systems toward payment data or security-impacting components.
TruSec works with the client and, when applicable, its Qualified Security Assessor to define the environment, in-scope systems, segmentation boundaries, application coverage, testing methods, and evidence required for the engagement.
Assessment Coverage
The final scope is based on the payment architecture, segmentation model, applicable PCI DSS requirements, and coordination with the organization’s compliance stakeholders.
Internet-facing systems, payment services, remote access, exposed administration, perimeter controls, and exploitable external attack paths.
Systems within or connected to the CDE, credential paths, insecure services, lateral movement, privilege escalation, and access to payment-related resources.
Testing from representative out-of-scope networks to determine whether the CDE and security-impacting systems are effectively isolated.
Payment applications, administrative functions, authentication, authorization, input handling, session security, data exposure, and business logic.
Remote access, multifactor controls, service accounts, administrative access, password weaknesses, and opportunities for unauthorized privilege.
Validation that failed tests and material findings have been corrected and that the original attack path is no longer effective.
How the Engagement Works
Review architecture, data flows, connected systems, segmentation, applications, access pathways, and required test perspectives.
Map external, internal, application, authentication, and segmentation scenarios to the approved environment.
Perform manual testing and controlled exploitation to determine whether payment systems or boundaries can be compromised.
Document results, failed controls, evidence, corrective actions, and remediation validation required for closure.
Deliverables
Reporting identifies the tested perspectives, affected systems, attack paths, risk, and outcome of segmentation or remediation validation.
The organization and its QSA remain responsible for confirming final PCI DSS scope and compliance interpretation. TruSec provides independent testing evidence within the approved engagement.
Common Questions
PCI DSS penetration testing commonly requires relevant external and internal perspectives. The exact scope depends on the cardholder data environment, connected systems, segmentation, applications, and applicable compliance interpretation.
Segmentation testing attempts to reach the cardholder data environment or security-impacting systems from representative networks intended to remain out of scope. The goal is to validate that isolation controls are effective.
Yes. Coordination can help align scope, test perspectives, evidence, reporting, and retesting expectations before work begins.
Retesting can be included in the statement of work and is typically needed to verify failed tests or remediated findings before closure.
No. Approved Scanning Vendor vulnerability scans and penetration testing are separate activities. An ASV scan identifies externally visible vulnerabilities, while penetration testing uses manual analysis and controlled exploitation to evaluate whether weaknesses and attack paths can compromise systems affecting the cardholder data environment.
Useful scoping information includes a cardholder data environment overview, network and data-flow diagrams, external and internal targets, segmentation boundaries, payment applications and APIs, remote-access methods, representative source networks, recent significant changes, QSA involvement, and the required completion date.
Representative source networks are selected with the client and, when applicable, the QSA based on the segmentation design, network types, access paths, locations, technologies, and controls used to isolate the cardholder data environment. The goal is to test meaningful perspectives rather than selecting sources arbitrarily.
Yes. Payment applications, administrative interfaces, web services, and APIs can be included when they are within scope or can affect the security of payment data. Application coverage is defined separately so user roles, endpoints, authentication flows, and business functions are tested appropriately.
Yes. The scope can include connected-to and security-impacting systems such as identity services, administrative workstations, jump hosts, remote-access systems, security tools, virtualization platforms, and other components that could provide a path to or affect the security of the cardholder data environment.
Yes. Reporting documents the approved scope, methodology, tested perspectives, affected systems, findings, segmentation outcomes, evidence, remediation guidance, and retest status. The organization and its QSA remain responsible for final PCI DSS scope and compliance determinations.
PCI DSS calls for penetration testing after significant infrastructure or application upgrades or changes that could affect the cardholder data environment or its security. Examples may include major network redesigns, new segmentation controls, significant application releases, new payment channels, or material authentication and remote-access changes. The organization and its QSA should confirm whether a specific change triggers testing.
Related Services
Share the CDE overview, external and internal targets, segmentation model, applications, representative source networks, QSA involvement, and target completion date.