Authentication
Login, account recovery, multifactor workflows, password controls, enumeration, lockout behavior, and alternate authentication paths.
Application Security
TruSec manually evaluates user roles, workflows, business logic, sessions, inputs, and data access to identify weaknesses that scanners and generic checklists routinely miss.
Service Overview
Modern application risk is often created by how functions interact—not by a single obvious vulnerability. A valid user may be able to access another customer’s records, a low-privileged role may reach administrative functions, or a normal workflow may be manipulated to bypass an intended business rule.
TruSec performs black-box, gray-box, or authenticated testing based on the objectives of the engagement. The assessment can include public and authenticated interfaces, administrative functions, file handling, integrations, client-side behavior, and role-specific workflows.
Assessment Coverage
Testing is adapted to the application architecture, user roles, data sensitivity, and business workflows.
Login, account recovery, multifactor workflows, password controls, enumeration, lockout behavior, and alternate authentication paths.
Horizontal and vertical access control, insecure direct object references, role boundaries, administrative functions, and tenant isolation.
Cookie protections, token handling, session lifecycle, logout behavior, fixation, replay, timeout, and concurrent session controls.
Injection, cross-site scripting, file upload, deserialization, path handling, server-side requests, and unsafe data processing.
Workflow bypass, transaction manipulation, sequence abuse, pricing or quantity logic, approval processes, and automation resistance.
Sensitive data leakage, verbose errors, source maps, client-side secrets, predictable identifiers, metadata, and insecure caching.
How the Engagement Works
Confirm architecture, roles, workflows, sensitive functions, environments, and testing constraints.
Enumerate accessible functions, parameters, objects, endpoints, client-side behavior, and trust boundaries.
Manually test security controls and safely demonstrate the impact of meaningful weaknesses.
Provide endpoint-specific evidence, remediation guidance, executive context, and optional retesting.
Deliverables
Each meaningful issue is documented with enough context for leadership to understand the risk and for technical teams to correct it.
Findings are separated by affected function or attack path so the report remains useful during remediation and verification.
Common Questions
Authenticated testing is strongly recommended when the application has user roles or protected workflows. Testing can include multiple accounts to evaluate horizontal and vertical authorization boundaries.
No. OWASP provides useful coverage guidance, but the assessment also evaluates application-specific business logic, workflows, trust boundaries, and abuse cases.
Yes, when appropriate safeguards and rules of engagement are defined. A staging environment may be preferred for destructive functions or unstable features, but it should accurately represent production.
Yes. Findings include practical corrective recommendations and enough evidence for developers or platform teams to reproduce and validate the issue.
Related Services
Share the application URL, environments, user roles, major workflows, technology stack, authentication method, and target testing window.